Yuki || 日本語の悩み Posted September 30, 2017 Report Share Posted September 30, 2017 Hello! Lalatina here, and today I'm here to see the communties opinion on Internal Security. So! Answear the questions below! 1: Rate the current state of "Internal Security" on a rate of 1-5. [ 1 -- 2 -- 3 -- 4 -- 5 ] 2: In your own words, what's the purpose of Internal Security? 3: What are the strengths and weaknesses of Internal Security? 4: What are the major problems facing the division? 5: What do you suggest that can improve the faction, make it more enjoyable? 6: Anything else you wish to add? (Put anything here): Thank you for participating! Have a nice day! ~Lalatina. ((If you want, you can PM me the survey.)) Link to comment
yahtz Posted September 30, 2017 Report Share Posted September 30, 2017 actual response 1: Rate the current state of "Internal Security" on a rate of 1-5. 0 2: In your own words, what's the purpose of Internal Security? It has none Everything it can do, NCO's do better Not only do they do it better, theres a much lower chance an NCO is as retardedly cruel or just socially dead as a marine They have absolutely ZERO use in missions why have a marine protect a VIP when you have metal suited marauders or any other bumblefuck recruit, the result will be the same They do investigations, but it's never of actual things happening it's always some made up shit because nothing that happens on the ship would require an investigation, especially not one that requires any heavy effort 3: What are the strengths and weaknesses of Internal Security? The green armor looks pretty good It has no leadership Its XO doesn't play. Its lead doesn't play. It's members don't know what to do, how to do it, or what they even do. And as before, it has no purpose Medics have a purpose, engineers have a purpose, marauders have a purpose, hell even fleet does marines are about as useful as pathfinders are 4: What are the major problems facing the division? All of them 5: What do you suggest that can improve the faction, make it more enjoyable? I dunno, I dunno if anything can improve it 6: Anything else you wish to add? (Put anything here): NO 1 1 2 1 Link to comment
MrGoodMeme Posted September 30, 2017 Report Share Posted September 30, 2017 I'm just a shitlord and memester but for what its worth, I've never really heard anything about Internal Security talked about in teamspeak. No one seems to care really, for good or for bad. So that tells me that they must not do a whole lot. In addition, every time something happens that a marine would take care of, an NCO usually does it. But what do I know, I'm a fucking faggot. Link to comment
Rook Posted September 30, 2017 Report Share Posted September 30, 2017 1: Rate the current state of "Internal Security" on a rate of 1-5. [2] 2: In your own words, what's the purpose of Internal Security? To act as a form of military police, as well as onboard vessel defense. 3: What are the strengths and weaknesses of Internal Security? Strength: Useful for escort of high ranking officers. Defending the bridge during a boarding. Weaknesses: Not much draw toward the division. NCO's do most of the discipline and not much incentive is offered to join. 4: What are the major problems facing the division? Redundancy. Since the MI are basically marines, the actual marines have to find a way to be unique. 5: What do you suggest that can improve the faction, make it more enjoyable? Have NCO's discipline less and use marines more. Have more active marine players. Work more closely with Fleet. 6: Anything else you wish to add? (Put anything here): It's an interesting division that needs to find it's jive once more! Link to comment
El Excellente Posted September 30, 2017 Report Share Posted September 30, 2017 just make this useless faction part of the useless deck crew Link to comment
Gabes. Posted September 30, 2017 Report Share Posted September 30, 2017 20 hours ago, yahtz said: Its XO doesn't play. I thought Centrix had someone else take over for my place as XO, isn't @E.Fox doing everything now? Link to comment
Dimov Posted September 30, 2017 Report Share Posted September 30, 2017 1 minute ago, Gabes. said: I thought Centrix had someone else take over for my place as XO, isn't @E.Fox doing everything now? doesn't change the fact the XO doesn't play 1 Link to comment
Yuki || 日本語の悩み Posted September 30, 2017 Author Report Share Posted September 30, 2017 25 minutes ago, Dimov said: doesn't change the fact the XO doesn't play Fox resigned. He tried putting me in as XO. 1 Link to comment
Tonic Posted October 1, 2017 Report Share Posted October 1, 2017 Seeing as how it's now beginning to be discussed in an open forum, I feel the need to address the situation regarding leadership. Centrix, Fox, and Gabes have all stepped away from the community due to one reason or another. The reasons behind their actions are not needed, because discussion of what has happened only detracts from the discussion of the future. The solution to the leadership concerns is that I will take control over InSec and have them fall directly under Zaiger's care until after changes are made. Yes, plans have been being made for two weeks. Yes, the preparations were slow. It was only recently that an old friend flew from the heavens and presented unto me the cream to that unscratchable itch. Yes, this survey does help refine those plans. Yes, I would love additional survey responses. And yes, the currently active marine playerbase have had an opportunity (albeit just today) to voice their opinions on the changes. The changes proposed have been overwhelmingly approved of. I will begin writing documents up and publishing them to the dreaded wiki. @Xalphox 1 1 Link to comment
Recommended Posts